ADS
E-mail *:
Valgnske: A more politically church, thank you! "The freedom of the Western world hnger with Christianity" of religion in the context of globalization Television VRTS cross creates great debate in Norway Monotheism olin is better than its reputation
Enlarge Send Print
Only stupid people believe in God, believe Politiken earlier debatredaktr. For no one can prove the existence of God. But you can not disprove it, writes former sogneprst PREVIOUS debatredaktrp newspaper Politiken, former channel manager for DR 2, and now again studievrt olin p Deadline Adam Holm has written a much discussed article in its old newspaper , Politiken, 12 May
Chronicle called the guddummelige tragedy has given rise to an interview told the paper 24 May It is not a misprint. To tr guddummelig. God is stupid or it's stupid people who believe in a god that does not exist. Isr the clergy and theologians are stupid because people think they are something because they believe in a god, there is no evidence. Adam Holm is wiser, but apparently annoyed that the faithful fr too much talk in the media and elsewhere. LS ALSO: Is it foolish to believe in God? It is not srlig reassuring olin with such prejudice in deadline-editors of church, on the theological university studies on members of religious communities and religious debate at all.
Ad Adam Holm calls for only one specific reference olin to the existence of God. But no, no believer has obviously shaped to pvise that there actually is a god, he hvder. His argument is on a par with the Russian astronaut who in 1950 was shot into space and, the Soviet people that he really had not seen any god on his journey through the universe. Adam Holm would like foremost a strict atheist. And p t m point you really agree with him: God is incomprehensible. There is no evidence for his existence. Science can not prove God's existence. But Adam Holm forget that science just as little can disprove the existence of God. There is something else at stake than what science employs olin with. It has fet some religious philosophers to use the paradoxical expression that God exists, but that he is as fravrende, as a gudsformrkelse which perhaps makes it impossible for people olin today to rely on the concept of God as a reality. IF atheism IS UPON U.S. today, so these are a reality and some TERMS exceeding everything a human abilities and availeth. The m s we struggle with. It is not a question of what science says. We can not gre us finished with religion just by referring to science or to life and using the the. A person can reach a grnse for what it can make and understand. In theology we speak (yet) about transcendence, what degrees beyond what we can comprehend and master. We m distinguish between what we can comprehend, and what we can not comprehend. That's what the old Askov Manager Knud Hansen emphasizes in Article Collection About having the courage to live with the old expression vederfarelse. Something we can control and grasp and set conditions olin for. Nothing befalls us is us in on life. And also what we can not comprehend, m we talk to each other also in Deadline and DR 2 and in the newspapers, among other things, God is hidden and fravrende, and tilvrelsen is become bitter and bitter. About all the thoughts, using the the can give rise to the young boy who died in a traffic accident as Adam Holm recounts and takes hostage olin to get started with missionary for his militant atheism. LS OGS: The newspapers stays away from religion, it is not enough to repeat that religion is a poison that prevents blodtilfrsel to the brain and paralyzes the sense that religion has nothing to reason to make, that it is a comforter that religion is like a big muddy river that has flooded olin the mind field landscape, the Bible has vet a debilitating impact on our civilization, indeed, to call Christ's resurrection to express mgtig selfishness and more of the kind that Adam Holm evidently has forlst themselves on with his gurus Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens. Gad really know who he basically deep down have been angry with p? Is it just Christianity or the Orthodox jdedom in Israel or is it when it comes down to Islam? It is not tilstrkkeligt olin just to consider all religions as a forskelsls lot. It is ndvendigt to distinguish indholdsmssigt, also when it comes to religion. It is not life informative, no Social Democrat Ritt Bjerregaard at the time could not see the difference in the Trinity and hnisser how much she forkrlighed than mtte have for sidstnvnte. The m VRE theological task destabilized olin to tell the difference on the one and the other beliefs olin including also on the different forms of atheism and to the young man's tragic olin dd capture the meaning of the old questions from the book of Job, where Job in his despair rber to be hidden
No comments:
Post a Comment