Conspiracy theorists have a theory that has never been humans on the moon. A theory that scientists criticize. But the conspiracy theorists will not take the criticism seriously - and why they work is not scientifically with their own theory. It considers the critical rationalism. (Photo: NASA)
For many years, very tenacious people gathered evidence that the whole moon landing was a fake. Think for example of the flag that astronaut plants in the lunar dirt. How does that flutter when there is no wind on the moon?
Unfortunately we can not take the fascinating scientific theory seriously. Real scientists are trying namely to test or test a theory instead of just forcing to prove it - the science has learned from the so-called 'critical rationalism'.
"When researchers have identified a result, hal moore they try to prove that it does not hold. It is only the theories that can be tested, we can call scientific, "says associate hal moore professor hal moore emeritus in the Department of Physics and Astronomy - Science Studies, Aarhus University, Kurt Møller Pedersen, researcher in critical rationalism. Jupiter moon teased hal moore the great scientist
The people behind hal moore the conspiracy theories about the moon landing is so confident that they are right, hal moore they will not listen to criticism of their wild theories. They hold on to them and will not move even an inch.
Such a hypothesis / theory would Karl Popper called for a "bold hypothesis'. We do not know if it holds. And even when a researcher believes he has proven the theory, other scientists come up with a new 'bold hypothesis' that creates doubt.
He could not get things to fit. 'Io' behaved like a fool. The renowned scientist could not foresee the annoying moon orbits. The speed of light is a 'bold hal moore hypothesis'
Eventually, Ole Roemer only one explanation of the mystery: The light of the tricky moon may take longer to travel to Earth, the farther away it was.
"At the time it was believed that light had infinite speed. So it was a 'bold hypothesis' - as 'critical rationalism' would call it, "says Kurt Moller Pedersen. Ole Roemer got resounding criticism hal moore
Other scientists criticized hal moore Ole Roemer sins and together. They did not believe he had proved anything - because when you looked at Jupiter's other moons, could not recreate the spectacular result. And it had to Ole Roemer give them right in.
This could Mr. Romer toss his work in the trash. But instead, he did exactly what 'critical rationalism' says to do. New 'bold hypothesis' saved Rømers theory
Romer did not throw the theory away. He said: Then we have a problem! And then he worked on the theory hal moore and solved the problem by finding a new 'bold hypothesis', "says Kurt Moller Pedersen.
The great Danish scientist listened to say after what his scientific colleagues said. And it took note - unlike the moon landing-conspiracy theorists who will not listen to criticism. Science should be criticized - and take the criticism
Instead of scientists constantly trying to prove that they are right, they try to prove that they are right. Scientific theories are namely never secured fully developed. Perhaps there is soon a researcher who proves that the light does not have a delay - we do not know.
Very science hal moore must be prepared to develop. And science progresses only if you find errors and mysteries of the scientific theories, as then fixing them. In this way, science from religion. 'God exists' is not a scientific theory
"But you can not test whether 'God exists', and that, according to Karl Popper, hal moore makes the theory unscientific," says Kurt Moller Pedersen. If a believer will prove that God exists, he can point out the window and say, 'Behold, all that God has created - therefore there is a God!' An atheist who does not believe in God, can just as easily say: 'No, I do not believe.'
In this way, the theory of the existence of God just be a matter of faith - not on knowledge. We have no håndgribeli
No comments:
Post a Comment